Day 8: How AI Processes vs. How Brains ACTUALLY Learn
- Brenna Westerhoff
- Sep 14
- 3 min read
You know what's wild? We've spent the last few years trying to make computers think like humans, and now everyone's worried that AI is going to replace teachers. But here's the thing - the more I understand about how AI processes information versus how kids' brains actually learn, the less worried I am. Actually, I'm not worried at all.
Let me show you why.
The Copy-Paste Machine vs. The Meaning Maker
AI is basically the world's most sophisticated pattern-matching machine. It sees millions of examples of text, finds patterns, and predicts what word should come next. It's impressive, sure. But it's fundamentally different from what happens in your student's brain when they're learning to read.
When ChatGPT sees the word "cat," it's matching patterns from its training data. It knows "cat" often appears near "meow" and "fur" and "pet." It's statistical probability all the way down.
But when little Maya in your classroom sees "cat"? Something completely different happens.
First, her brain lights up in about four different regions simultaneously. The visual cortex processes the shapes. The phonological processor connects those shapes to sounds. The semantic network pulls up every cat she's ever seen, touched, or heard about. And here's the kicker - her emotional centers fire up too, maybe remembering her grandmother's cat or that time she got scratched.
AI processes information. Kids create meaning.
The Experience Gap Nobody Talks About
Let’s dig into this concept: Students decode a simple sentence about making cookies. The text said, "The dough felt sticky between her fingers."
An AI would process this perfectly. It would understand the syntactic structure, identify "sticky" as an adjective modifying "dough," and could probably generate 50 similar sentences.
But watch what happened with students:
Jamie immediately rubbed his fingers together, recreating the sensation. Sofia made a disgusted face because she hates sticky textures. Marcus connected it to the slime he made last Weekend. And Aisha? She asked if we could make cookies during math because now she was hungry.
That's not processing. That's experiencing.
The Mirror Neuron Magic
This is where it gets really interesting. Kids have these things called mirror neurons that fire both when they do something AND when they watch someone else do it. So when I model sounding out a word, showing that slight frustration when I hit a tricky part, then the satisfaction when I get it? Their brains are literally practicing with me.
AI doesn't have mirror neurons. It can't feel my frustration or share my "aha" moment. It can simulate these things in text, sure, but simulation isn't experience.
When Marcus watches the teacher struggle with the word "thoroughly" and then break it into chunks, his brain is rehearsing that struggle. He's not just learning the word - he's learning the process, the persistence, the emotional regulation that comes with working through difficulty.
Why This Changes How We Teach
Once you understand this, you can't teach reading the same way. You realize that:
Worksheets are not enough - Kids need to see you thinking out loud, struggling, succeeding. They need that mirror neuron activation.
Context isn't just helpful, it's essential - Every personal connection, every "this reminds me of..." moment is literally building neural pathways that AI could never replicate.
Emotional engagement isn't a nice-to-have - It's how the brain decides what's worth remembering.
Mistakes are gold - When a kid reads "house" as "horse" and then self-corrects, they're doing something AI can't: learning from the feeling of being wrong.
The Thing That Keeps Me Up at Night
You know what actually worries me? Not that AI will replace teachers. It's that we'll start teaching kids to think like AI instead of teaching AI to support how kids actually think.
I see it happening already. Multiple-choice everything. Isolated skill practice. Information without experience. We're optimizing for what's easy to measure instead of what actually builds readers.
What You Can Do Tomorrow
Stop asking yourself, "How can I compete with AI?" Start asking, "What can I do that AI never could?"
Here's your starter list:
Share your actual reading struggles with students
Connect every text to their lives, their experiences, their emotions
Let them see you think out loud, especially when you're unsure
Create moments of shared discovery where you're genuinely learning together
Celebrate the messy, human parts of learning - the frustration, the breakthrough, the joy
Because here's the truth: AI processes text. Teachers build readers. And there's a universe of difference between those two things.