Day 65: Phonological vs. Orthographic vs. Semantic Processing Distinctions
- Brenna Westerhoff
- Dec 12, 2025
- 5 min read
"She can sound out the word perfectly, knows what it means when I say it, but has no idea what she just read!"
The teacher was describing Lily, and I knew exactly what was happening. Her three processing systems weren't talking to each other.
"Imagine three friends who speak different languages trying to plan a party together," I said. "That's what's happening in Lily's brain. Let me show you the three processors and why they must work together."
The Three-Ring Circus
Reading requires three distinct processing systems:
Phonological Processing
● Hears sounds in words
● Segments and blends sounds
● The "sound department"
Orthographic Processing
● Recognizes letter patterns
● Stores visual word forms
● The "spelling department"
Semantic Processing
● Understands meaning
● Connects to knowledge
● The "meaning department"
Lily's departments work separately. They need to merge.
The Processing Breakdown
Watch what happens when Lily reads "elephant":
Phonological: /e/ /l/ /e/ /f/ /a/ /n/ /t/ ✓ (sounds correct) Orthographic: E-L-E-P-H-A-N-T ✓ (sees letters) Semantic: ??? (no meaning activated)
She processed sounds and letters but meaning didn't connect. Like GPS coordinates without a map.
The Three-Way Connection
Successful reading needs all three:
Reading "dog":
● Phonological: /d/ /o/ /g/
● Orthographic: D-O-G
● Semantic: Furry pet that barks CONNECTED = Comprehension
If any link breaks, reading fails.
The Different Deficits
Weak Phonological, Strong Others:
● Can't sound out new words
● Memorizes whole words
● Good comprehension when listening
● Spelling is visual memory
This is classic dyslexia pattern.
Weak Orthographic, Strong Others:
● Can sound out but can't remember spellings
● Slow reading
● Poor spelling despite good phonics
● Doesn't recognize words instantly
This is surface dyslexia pattern.
Weak Semantic, Strong Others:
● Decodes perfectly
● No comprehension
● Word calling
● Can spell but not define
This is hyperlexia pattern.
The Lily Problem
Lily has strong phonological and orthographic but weak semantic connection.
She's processing words like:
● Phone number (knows digits, says them, no meaning)
● Foreign language (pronounces correctly, no understanding)
The bridge between decoding and meaning is broken.
The Neural Neighborhoods
These processors live in different brain areas:
Phonological: Superior temporal region Orthographic: Occipito-temporal region Semantic: Middle temporal region
They must communicate across neural highways. Sometimes the highways need construction.
The Development Timeline
Typical progression:
● Age 3-5: Phonological develops (hearing sounds)
● Age 5-7: Orthographic develops (learning letters)
● Age 4-8: Semantic expands (vocabulary grows)
● Age 6-8: Integration strengthens (reading emerges)
But some kids develop unevenly, creating processing gaps.
The Assessment Triangle
Test all three separately:
Phonological Test: "What sounds in 'stop'?" (no letters shown)
Orthographic Test: "Is this spelled right?" (show words briefly)
Semantic Test: "What does 'ancient' mean?" (spoken, not read)
Then test integration: "Read this word and tell me what it means."
The Intervention Strategies
For Weak Phonological:
● Rhyming games
● Sound segmentation
● Oral blending
● NO LETTERS initially
For Weak Orthographic:
● Word shape activities
● Spelling patterns
● Visual memory games
● Rapid word recognition
For Weak Semantic:
● Vocabulary building
● Context discussions
● Multiple meanings
● Background knowledge
For Weak Integration:
● Connect all three explicitly
● Slow down processing
● Build bridges between systems
The Classroom Connections
Making connections visible:
"Let's read 'butterfly':
● What sounds do you hear? (phonological)
● What letters do you see? (orthographic)
● What picture comes to mind? (semantic)
● Now connect all three!"
Building explicit bridges between processors.
The Multi-Sensory Magic
Engaging all three processors simultaneously:
● Say it (phonological)
● Spell it (orthographic)
● Define it (semantic)
● Use it (integration)
Every word, every time, until automatic.
The Speed Differential
Processing speeds vary:
Marcus:
● Phonological: Fast
● Orthographic: Slow
● Semantic: Fast Result: Bottleneck at visual processing
Sarah:
● Phonological: Slow
● Orthographic: Fast
● Semantic: Fast Result: Bottleneck at sound processing
Different bottlenecks need different interventions.
What You Can Do Tomorrow
Assess all three: Where's the breakdown?
Build missing processors: Target weak areas specifically.
Connect explicitly: "Sound + letters + meaning = reading"
Slow down: Allow processing time for integration.
Make visible: Draw connections between systems.
Celebrate connections: "You connected all three!"
The Lily Breakthrough
Week 1: Identified semantic disconnect Week 2: Pre-taught vocabulary before reading Week 3: Connected words to images/experiences Week 4: Slowed down to allow meaning processing Week 5: Built semantic maps while reading Week 6: All three processors talking!
She went from word-calling to reading with comprehension.
The Parent Partnership
"Practice reading at home!"
Better: "Build all three processors:
● Play sound games (phonological)
● Notice words everywhere (orthographic)
● Talk about what words mean (semantic)"
The Beautiful Balance
Perfect readers have:
● Automatic phonological processing
● Instant orthographic recognition
● Rich semantic networks
● Seamless integration
Struggling readers need:
● Targeted processor support
● Integration practice
● Bridge building
● Time to connect
The System Symphony
When all three work together:
Child sees word → orthographic processor recognizes → phonological processor activates sounds → semantic processor retrieves meaning → comprehension occurs
Milliseconds. Automatic. Beautiful.
When one fails:
Child sees word → orthographic recognizes → phonological activates → semantic ??? → confusion
The symphony becomes noise.
The Tomorrow Teaching
Tomorrow, think in threes:
Every word taught:
1. How does it sound?
2. How is it spelled?
3. What does it mean?
Every reading struggle:
1. Which processor is weak?
2. How can I support it?
3. How can I build integration?
Every intervention:
1. Target the weak processor
2. Strengthen the strong ones
3. Build bridges between all
Because reading isn't one skill.
It's three processors working in harmony.
Phonological. Orthographic. Semantic.
When they work separately, reading fails. When they work together, reading soars.
And every child deserves all three processors working in beautiful, integrated harmony.
That's not just reading.
That's the neuroscience of meaning-making.
And once you understand the three processors?
You never teach reading the same way again.
You teach the symphony.
All three parts. In harmony. Creating readers who don't just decode or recognize or understand.
But do all three. Simultaneously. Automatically. Beautifully.
That's reading. Real reading. All three processors firing together.
That's the goal. That's the teaching. That's the magic.