Day 363: Technology Trends vs. Lasting Change
- Brenna Westerhoff
- Dec 15, 2025
- 1 min read
"Should we learn cursive?" Aisha asked. "My mom says it's important, but we all type everything."
That question launched a deeper discussion about what changes and what endures. Technology transforms constantly. But human needs—connection, understanding, expression, growth—those are constants. The trick is knowing which changes matter and which are just noise.
We mapped technology changes versus human constants. Tablets replaced paper—but the need to record thoughts remained. Video calls replaced visits—but the need for connection remained. AI replaces calculation—but the need for logical thinking remained.
The pattern emerged: tools change, purposes persist. So we focus on purposes, not tools. Don't learn cursive because it's traditional. Learn fine motor control, which cursive develops. Don't learn coding because it's trendy. Learn logical thinking, which coding develops.
But here's the trap: mistaking trends for transformation. Every year there's a new "revolutionary" education technology. Interactive whiteboards. Tablets. VR headsets. AI tutors. Most are just new tools for old purposes. The real transformations are rare and usually invisible at first.
We studied real transformations versus trends. The internet wasn't just a new tool—it fundamentally changed how information works. AI isn't just a calculator upgrade—it's changing what human intelligence means. These aren't trends. They're transformations.
The adaptation strategy became clear: build foundational skills that work across technologies. Critical thinking works whether you're reading books or screens. Communication skills transfer across all media. Problem-solving approaches work regardless of tools.
Yesterday's experiment: Do the same task with three different technologies. Write a story with pencil, computer, and voice recording. The tool changed the process but not the core skill—storytelling. That's what we build—the core that persists.