top of page

Day 324: When Engaging Multiple Senses Helps vs. Distracts

  • Writer: Brenna Westerhoff
    Brenna Westerhoff
  • Dec 15, 2025
  • 3 min read

I once taught a lesson where kids were tasting different flavors while reading about character emotions, listening to mood music, touching fabric samples for texture descriptions, and smelling essential oils for setting atmosphere. It was sensory overload disguised as "multi-sensory learning."


Maria threw up. Not from the food—from the overwhelming sensory input. Tommy shut down completely, hands over his ears. Sarah started crying because the lavender smell reminded her of her grandmother's funeral. And Marcus? He was so focused on the gummy bears that he didn't read a single word.


That disaster taught me something crucial: engaging multiple senses isn't automatically good. It can actually prevent learning if you're not strategic about it. The brain has limited processing power, and if it's busy processing five sensory inputs, there's not much left for actual thinking.


The revelation came during a conversation with our school's occupational therapist. She was observing my classroom and noticed Carlos constantly fidgeting. I was about to redirect him when she stopped me. "He's fidgeting to focus," she said. "The movement is helping him process the auditory information. If you stop the movement, you'll stop the processing."


Mind. Blown.


That's when I learned about sensory diet—not food, but the sensory input our brains need to function optimally. Some kids need movement to think. Others need absolute stillness. Some process better with background music. Others need complete silence. And here I was, forcing everyone into the same sensory experience.


So I started what I call "sensory differentiation." Not everyone gets the same sensory input. During silent reading, some kids wear noise-canceling headphones. Others listen to white noise. Some sit on wobble cushions. Others lie on the floor. Same activity, different sensory supports.


But here's the key: the sensory input has to support, not distract from, the cognitive work. Playing ocean sounds while reading about the beach? Probably helpful. Playing ocean sounds while solving math problems? Probably distracting. Unless the math is about ocean data. Then maybe?


The breakthrough was discovering "complementary sensory channels." Reading uses visual processing primarily. So adding auditory input (like soft music) might help because it's a different channel. But adding more visual input (like a busy background) competes for the same processing channel and creates interference.


I tested this extensively. When we're doing visual work (reading, writing), I might add: gentle movement (standing desks), subtle auditory input (white noise), or minor tactile input (fidget tools). But I avoid additional visual stimulation. The walls near our reading areas are intentionally blank.


When we're doing auditory work (listening to stories, discussions), I might add: visual anchors (simple drawings), tactile experiences (note-taking), or movement (hand gestures). But I minimize auditory competition. No background music during discussions.


The timing matters too. Sensory input at the beginning of a lesson can activate the brain. In the middle, it can refocus attention. At the end, it can help consolidate memory. But constant sensory input becomes white noise—the brain tunes it out.


Here's what transformed my practice: sensory preview and review. Before reading about the rainforest, we spend thirty seconds listening to rainforest sounds. Just thirty seconds. It primes the brain, creates context, but doesn't overwhelm. After reading, we might touch leaves or look at photos. The sensory experience bookends the learning but doesn't compete with it.


The individual sensory profiles changed everything. I had kids self-assess: What helps you focus? What distracts you? Marcus discovered he reads better while walking. Jennifer needs absolute silence. Tommy focuses better with classical music. Aisha needs to doodle. Once kids knew their sensory preferences, they could advocate for what they needed.


But here's the surprising part: sometimes the "wrong" sensory input is exactly right. When kids are overthinking, I add sensory distraction intentionally. "Everyone stand up and do ten jumping jacks." The physical sensation breaks the overthinking cycle. When they're mentally exhausted, a strong sensory input (like peppermint smell) can refocus them.

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Day 278: Emotion & Memory in Reading Success

"I'll never forget that book - it made me cry." "I can't remember anything from that chapter - it was so boring." "That story scared me so much I remember every detail." These weren't reviews from a b

 
 
Day 277: The Forgetting Curve & Review Timing

"We just learned this yesterday! How can they not remember?" Every teacher's lament. Students who demonstrated perfect understanding on Tuesday claim complete ignorance on Thursday. They're not lying

 
 
Day 364: When Tradition Serves Students vs. Systems

"Why do we still have summer vacation?" Marcus asked. "Nobody farms anymore." He's right. Summer vacation exists because 150 years ago, kids needed to help with harvest. Now it exists because... it ex

 
 
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • TikTok
  • Youtube
bottom of page